Friday, July 11, 2008

The Morality Myth

For both the daily news aficionado and the occasional newspaper headline skimmer, it is easy to recall some of the biggest media blunders throughout history. Being the 21st century, America has experienced everything from a simple Freudian slip from a news anchor to disastrous copy editing errors in a newspaper headline. More than not, these mistakes are accepted as reminders of our human imperfection and parodies are even made to commemorate some of our favorite public slip-ups.

The 2007 controversy with Don Imus, however, is an entirely different story. Shock jock or not, we all know that the radio veteran found himself unemployed and in the middle of national social backlash after a brief inappropriate comment made about the Rutgers women's basketball team.

The details are not difficult to unravel; most of MSNBC's advertisers associated with Imus in the Morning pulled out within hours, media statements were prepared, and personal apologies began to hit the airwaves.

The Corporate Tremble

If one knows anything about both corporate and private media, a colossal amount of revenue is generated from network ad space sales. Simply put: no advertisers, no show. More than a year after Imus' radio faux pas, he is consequently back on the air. However, this time advertisers are timid to commit their financial loyalty. Big surprise. Most Americans would like to believe that Imus' being fired, public embarrassment, and slow return to the spotlight are all part of his moral punishment.

Not so fast. Put yourselves in the shoes of MSNBC. If Imus' dispicable comments resonated with less controversy throughout society, it's almost guaranteed that he would never have been removed from his show. Furthermore, advertisers would be just as eager as ever to throw cash at the radio show. Timid behavior from the news corporation's leaders and their advertisers is simply a reflection of how the public might react and not necessarily a reaction of their moral code.

The bottom line is this: Living in a capitalist society means everyone is in the business of something. And that, of course, means you either turn a profit or get out squeezed out of the industry. A corporation's dramatic decision to cancel a show such as Imus' or make major changes in the company are decisions made on grounds of perceived profitabilty, not moral standards.

I'm not saying that MSNBC or any other conglomerate is bigotted or racist, but the truth is companies will tend to choose their path in the marketplace based on risk management and profit potential... not necessarily moral grounds.


Cutting Imus was, in essence, a move to cut a severe loss in ratings. Advertisers on the show pulling out was a natural reaction to save face in public association. No one wants to be caught talking to the kid on the playground that everyone hates. Furthermore, bringing Imus back is in part a result of financial analysts predicting a monetary comeback if Imus was reinstated.

Get the picture?

Love or hate what you've read, please leave a comment or feel free to drop me an email at pauljmatson@gmail.com.

0 reactions:

Post a Comment | Feed



 
^

The Social Media Institute
original page design by Paul J. Matson
Creative Commons License